More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

The Highway 7 extension would run through almost every wetland and woodlot between Kitchener and Guelph

By Michael Parkinson

Published March 1999

If you have been following the Good Work News for the past few years, you will already be aware of the contro­versy surrounding plans from the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) to con­struct a brand new expressway between Kitchener and Guelph. The issue has become more publicized recently and, consequently, increasingly political. The issue currently remains unresolved, but a decision from the Province could come soon.

The MTO is proposing to build a new, controlled access expressway that will run between the two cities about 1km north of the existing Highway 7. With a design similar to the 401, the MTO says this is the best solution to solving perceived congestion and safety problems during the rush hour commute along the existing Highway 7. The MTO submitted the required Environmental Assessment to the Minister of Environment in December 1998.

There is controversy over MTO plans however, including doubts about the merits of the project raised by WPIRG which has called the project “excessive.” Other interest groups, citizens, municipali­ties and agencies are questioning the ne­cessity of the project, but find themselves shut out of the decision-making process by bureaucrats and politicians with a clear agenda of getting this project through the approvals process quickly. A coalition is forming that will advocate for a com­mon sense transportation solution. To be a part of this coalition, you could phone WPIRG.

But why all the fuss? Generally speaking, all of the individuals and groups expressing concern are upset about what they see as a biased study intended to justify an antiquated mega-project we don’t really need, one with extreme im­pacts on the natural and socio-economic environments. Advocates of a sustain­able transportation plan say we can do bet­ter with less cost and less impact on the envi­ronment.

The MTO says the construction cost of this new expressway will exceed $100,000,000 (one hundred million dol­lars), which works out to a onetime pay­ment of about $160 for every man, woman and child in the Region of Waterloo and Wellington County. The operating costs, which would likely exceed $250,000 per year, are not included in this estimate. Opponents question whether such a sum of money could not be put to better use in our communities given the high compe­tition for public dollars. In any event, op­ponents are convinced that the perceived transportation problems could be solved with a fraction of those funds.

The most publicized concerns are those related to the impact on the natu­ral environment. More than 1 000 hec­tares of significant wetland areas will be degraded, many forests and woodlots will be destroyed, streams and the Grand River will be negatively affected, and more than 180 hectares of prime agricultural land will be eliminated. Many (significant) plant and wildlife species will die, including fish and birds. MTO plans would have the expressway pave over virtually every woodlot and wetland between Kitchener and Guelph, despite the fact that every level of government has placed environmen­tal designations on the features along this route. All of which begs the question of why we bother to survey and designate significant environmental features if there is no political will to preserve such features when the time comes to make decisions.

Though WPIRG and others will continue to speak out against this project, with your help we will be stronger. If you have an opinion, let Regional Council, your MPPs and The Record know about it. Educate yourself, volunteer your time with a group or speak with others in your community.

Democracy means more than vot­ing every few years. It depends on the participation of citizens in issues affecting our quality of life. Consider getting in­volved in the Excessway 7 issue—the wheels of democracy depend on it.

Good Work News is The Working Centre’s quarterly newspaper that reports on our latest community building efforts and seeks out ideas which redefine work, consumerism, and sustainable living. First published in 1984, we have now published over 150 issues with a circulation of 13,000.

Subscribe to Good Work News with a donation of any amount to The Working Centre.

Site Menu

The Integrated Circle of Care is a fluid and collaborative approach followed by workers from different agencies weaving through St. John’s Kitchen. Within this approach, staff members from each agency are aware of their specific personal roles. However, the high level of collaboration between workers means that people can approach any worker, without knowing their agency association or specific role, and still receive support – either that worker will support the person directly, or they will introduce the person to another worker who can support the person more appropriately.

This approach makes relationships more natural and support more accessible. Workers from different agencies are easily approachable, meaning that people build relationships with multiple workers. Having relationships with different workers is important to a person’s support – it makes support from a trusted source easy to find, and means that people have a choice of worker to approach in any given situation.

In order to maintain a circle of care around a person, workers from different agencies ask for consent from the person for information to be shared between workers. Continuous communication between workers helps to ensure that people do not fall into gaps between services, and also that services are not duplicated.