More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

The Excessway 7 Fact Sheet

By Michael Parkinson

Published December 1998

The Ministry of Transportation is planning to build a new expressway be­tween Kitchener and Guelph to replace the existing Highway 7 route. The express­way will have four lanes, controlled access, and will be designed for 120 km/hr (the posted speed will be 100 km/hr). The Min­istry says that the unacceptable traffic con­gestion constitutes a safety issue and that a new expressway is warranted. The idea for this expressway was first conceived around 1970 when officials were advocating the immediate construction of a new Highway 7.

The project goes to the Minister of Environment (Norm Sterling) any day now for a decision to approve, modify, or not approve the project. It is likely to be ap­proved, despite concerns raised by munici­palities, government agencies, citizens groups and members of the public. The last public meeting on this issue was held in 1994.

The expressway is to be built about 1 km north of the existing Highway 7 and will have extreme effects on the natural environment. The area along the route con­tains prime agricultural land, provincially significant wetlands and wetland com­plexes, woodlots, streams and the Grand River. The Mayor of Guelph has publicly voiced concerns about the negative impact of this expressway on the air quality locally (K-W has had some of the worst air quality days this year in the entire province.) There are significant wildlife impacts.

The expressway is estimated by the engineering consultants to cost $90,000,000. Operating expenses are not included in this estimate. The expressway will have a negative impact on residents in the Wel­lington Street neighbourhood. It will dis­place many businesses operating along the Kitchener end of Highway 7 (Victoria Street). Owners have said in surveys that they rely on drive-by traffic to sustain their businesses. Although the Ministry of Trans­portation was asked to hear their concerns, the Ministry has not addressed the impacts in these areas. The project will also not im­prove the state of public transportation be­tween the two cities.

A group of concerned citizens and organizations is preparing to have this project cancelled, but the support of other individuals and groups is crucial. We op­pose this project for a wide variety of rea­sons, including the impact on our natural, social and economic environments. Many are of the opinion that there is not a trans­portation problem between the two cities. Furthermore, many people wonder if spending $90,000,000 plus to save rush hour commuters a couple of minutes in travel time is a good use of taxpayer’s money. What would your priorities be if you had $90,000,000 plus to spend on pub­lic projects in this Region? What if you could spend the interest income annually from $90,000,000 on public projects?

If you can, p lease write a letter to Elizabeth Witmer, MPP for Waterloo or to your local newspaper about the project. There will be a public meeting on De­cember 3rd at 7:30 pm at Victoria School Centre. Citizens will be making presenta­tions to Waterloo Regional Council and Kitchener and Waterloo City Council over the next couple of weeks.

Good Work News is The Working Centre’s quarterly newspaper that reports on our latest community building efforts and seeks out ideas which redefine work, consumerism, and sustainable living. First published in 1984, we have now published over 150 issues with a circulation of 13,000.

Subscribe to Good Work News with a donation of any amount to The Working Centre.

Site Menu

The Integrated Circle of Care is a fluid and collaborative approach followed by workers from different agencies weaving through St. John’s Kitchen. Within this approach, staff members from each agency are aware of their specific personal roles. However, the high level of collaboration between workers means that people can approach any worker, without knowing their agency association or specific role, and still receive support – either that worker will support the person directly, or they will introduce the person to another worker who can support the person more appropriately.

This approach makes relationships more natural and support more accessible. Workers from different agencies are easily approachable, meaning that people build relationships with multiple workers. Having relationships with different workers is important to a person’s support – it makes support from a trusted source easy to find, and means that people have a choice of worker to approach in any given situation.

In order to maintain a circle of care around a person, workers from different agencies ask for consent from the person for information to be shared between workers. Continuous communication between workers helps to ensure that people do not fall into gaps between services, and also that services are not duplicated.