Bigger is Sometimes Worse
The amalgamation debate in Waterloo Region has sparked passionate arguments for and against combining our communities into one, big city. Despite the strength of both arguments no one is addressing a vital, underlying assumption: that bigger is better. The amalgamation side builds their case on the idea that bigger, more centralized government will be more efficient. Those against amalgamation question whether local democracy is a worthwhile price. The problem is that the shared, underlying assumption is an unwarranted one: bigger is only sometimes better. Sometimes bigger is actually worse.