More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Supporting Livelihood Through Local Exchange

By Stephanie Mancini

Published in September 2013

How often do we think about wider implications when we purchase a cup of coffee, groceries, clothing, a book? These transactions are increasingly electronic – separated from the provider of the good or service. How often do we know the person, company or country where goods are made?

Is it possible to recapture purchases made between people we know who live nearby? We can make intentional choices about the “who” and “where” of purchasing goods and services. This seems like an oddly idealistic concept.

Can we dedicate a portion of our purchasing to those in our community who are working to support their own livelihoods? Can we support the entrepreneurial efforts of individuals who are exploring the ideas of livelihood and production?

It can be inconvenient shopping from multiple individuals and locations. It is can be harder to buy from someone we know – what if the product doesn’t meet the quality that we have come to expect from the standardized shopping culture? Locally produced goods are unique and they can lack the consistency and efficiency of larger producers.

It takes an intentional spirit to change convenient shopping patterns to support a wider community good. We expect little from cheaply produced consumer goods that quickly become outdated, but we hesitate to invest those same dollars in someone’s locally developed product or service.

At The Working Centre we have seen the ingenuity of people working on creative livelihoods – one woman has become a local farmer, a couple turned their home into a homesteading bed and breakfast, people turning computer skills into building accessible technology, people supplementing social incomes with sewing, cleaning, baking, and people starting creative and artistic home based businesses. This is the work of building local community.

It requires intentional choice to support and sustain local enterprise. If we see the importance of small purchasing decisions and support local individuals and organizations, then we move closer to relationship-based exchanges with our neighbours.  

Livelihood can be about living with less money, but it is not necessarily about living with less. The practice of sustainable livelihoods, lived in a local way, strengthens community in sharp contrast to dislocation, isolation, and exclusion. By reclaiming local connectedness, by embedding economic exchange in relationships with people who live near us, we can reclaim our capacity to be part of a thriving community.

Good Work News is The Working Centre’s quarterly newspaper that reports on our latest community building efforts and seeks out ideas which redefine work, consumerism, and sustainable living. First published in 1984, we have now published over 150 issues with a circulation of 13,000.

Subscribe to Good Work News with a donation of any amount to The Working Centre.

Site Menu

The Integrated Circle of Care is a fluid and collaborative approach followed by workers from different agencies weaving through St. John’s Kitchen. Within this approach, staff members from each agency are aware of their specific personal roles. However, the high level of collaboration between workers means that people can approach any worker, without knowing their agency association or specific role, and still receive support – either that worker will support the person directly, or they will introduce the person to another worker who can support the person more appropriately.

This approach makes relationships more natural and support more accessible. Workers from different agencies are easily approachable, meaning that people build relationships with multiple workers. Having relationships with different workers is important to a person’s support – it makes support from a trusted source easy to find, and means that people have a choice of worker to approach in any given situation.

In order to maintain a circle of care around a person, workers from different agencies ask for consent from the person for information to be shared between workers. Continuous communication between workers helps to ensure that people do not fall into gaps between services, and also that services are not duplicated.